uk.people.disability

On Nov 14, 2:30 pm, riverbank wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:42:29 +0000, pete wrote:
> >On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:09:53 -0000, "Paul Nutteing (valid email
> >address in post script )" wrote:
>
> >>pete wrote in message
> >>news:c19kj3pf1bhbc69gim6kd97hphofhfbub4@ ...
> >>> I have tried to read your research several times Paul but each time my
> >>> eyes have started to close before I understood just what your
> >>> conclusion is? I know what you are saying about NDA being an ureliable
> >>> way to convict anyone but I don't understand why SB would want to stop
> >>> your research being read by everybody? What does it matter to SB if
> >>> you are right or even if you are wrong?
> >>> pete
> >>> /
> >>> /photos/ipswich
>
> >>Main file is big enough as it is
>
> >>SB prattification detailed about
> >>2/3 down this file
> >> /
> >>headed
> >>Second Arrest by Hampshire Incompetent Plod
>
> >I have now re-read that part. I do not know the background and all I
> >know is you have been badly treated by a few institution and a few
> >people. It seems to me any invovlement with SB must be due to you
> >being able to get your site hosted off-shore. My problem remains then
> >why is this such a problem for SB when your argument seems to be with
> >the terrible SS and your former companion. Is it correct to say SB is
> >not interested in your work in DNA but is interested in how you get
> >you site hosted outside of their remitt?
> >pete
>
> A note to the unwary - this is how the shit-heap grooming starts. A
> bit of sympathy for a current problem, a question at the end to keep
> things going..... you then move to e-mail - exchange a few personal
> details and by then it's too late.
> Some time in the future when he is disagreeing with you and you have
> probably made him look silly, he will then drop in to a post your real
> name when everyone else is using the name you post under. This is the
> "subtle" warning that he has information on you - and there's more
> where this came from.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

==============================

Yeah but Jayzizz, who give a shite?

We are living in a shit civilisation.

Did you never read a history book?

Did you never read a newspaper?

Human beings are fuckin shite.

Our civilisation is fuckin shite.

Why should you care about what anyone is saying about you, when ALL
human beings are STINKING SHITS who belong in the nearest septic
tank............

We are SHIT.

Our civilisation is SHIT.

To be human is to be a stinking heap of shit who belongs in the
nearest septic tank.

That's why I said I find Tony Holland so refreshing. I don't speak for
Tony Holland and he can tell me I've got him wrong if he likes. All
I'm saying is that I have found Tony Holland quiet refreshing because
he does not seem to be glorifying himself and he seems to grasp the
fundamental fact of life, the fact that human beings are pure 100%
shit, and so there's no such thing as "dignity" in this civilisation
and there is no use in trying to "protect your reputation" when every
human being is a stinking heap of shit who belongs in the nearest
septic tank.

Did you never read a newspaper?

Did you never read a history book?

To be human is to be SHIT.

What we need to do now is to arrest God and to bring God before the
courts to answer the charge of creating a SHIT species called
humanity.

Bejayzizz he's not much of a fuckin god if WE are all he was able to
create.

Furthermore, given that human beings are SHIT, it follows that our God
must be shit too.