uk.people.disability

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:42:29 +0000, pete wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:09:53 -0000, "Paul Nutteing (valid email
>address in post script )" wrote:
>
>>pete wrote in message
>>news:c19kj3pf1bhbc69gim6kd97hphofhfbub4@ ...
>>> I have tried to read your research several times Paul but each time my
>>> eyes have started to close before I understood just what your
>>> conclusion is? I know what you are saying about NDA being an ureliable
>>> way to convict anyone but I don't understand why SB would want to stop
>>> your research being read by everybody? What does it matter to SB if
>>> you are right or even if you are wrong?
>>> pete
>>> /
>>> /photos/ipswich
>>
>>Main file is big enough as it is
>>
>>SB prattification detailed about
>>2/3 down this file
>> /
>>headed
>>Second Arrest by Hampshire Incompetent Plod
>
>I have now re-read that part. I do not know the background and all I
>know is you have been badly treated by a few institution and a few
>people. It seems to me any invovlement with SB must be due to you
>being able to get your site hosted off-shore. My problem remains then
>why is this such a problem for SB when your argument seems to be with
>the terrible SS and your former companion. Is it correct to say SB is
>not interested in your work in DNA but is interested in how you get
>you site hosted outside of their remitt?
>pete


A note to the unwary - this is how the shit-heap grooming starts. A
bit of sympathy for a current problem, a question at the end to keep
things going..... you then move to e-mail - exchange a few personal
details and by then it's too late.
Some time in the future when he is disagreeing with you and you have
probably made him look silly, he will then drop in to a post your real
name when everyone else is using the name you post under. This is the
"subtle" warning that he has information on you - and there's more
where this came from.