uk.people.disability

"Ippy Lad" wrote in message
news:4g77i3hrqi7u2cic1hdktjhk6uv892cri5@ ...
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:06:01 +0100, kevinhill@
> wrote:
>>
>>In a way this whole episode confirms what has been said about Turtill
>>on these groups for a considerable time.
>
>
> Shouldn't the benefit fraud people now be informed of Mr Turtills lies
> about being disabled? I mean it would only be right wouldnt it?
>
I shall get on to that come Monday morning, after all did not the Judge
say that he "could see no proof of Peter Turtill's disabilities" when he
was in Court?

That's good enough for me, if a Judge thinks Peter Turtill isn't
then it's time the Benefit people knew about this case. After
all, it's my taxes that are helping fund this fraudulent claim.

Whilst I am doing my public duty, I may have to inform the Judge about
"having his grumpy head on" when he heard Peter Turtill's case. That
could be grounds for appeal and another £1,000 costs for the loser.