alt.social-security-disability

TAKE YOUR MEDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"mcs" wrote in message news:$@trnddc08...
> plead that all doctors , especially ones that do research find out what
> the differences in health are for all people who get the kind of
> pollution
> / greenhouse gases, coal and concentrated car and bus and truck diesel
> emissions, oil refinery emissions and industry emissions a big city like
> our
> city (Philly) gets compared with people who get clean(er) only
> do
> I think in almost every conceivable area, that people who are exposed to
> this much particulate pollution daily (not good air . but at least
> moderate as defined by epa and ) are more prone to diseases of
> lungs heart and most every area of the body MORE but they lose their
> health
> faster and have more asthma and respiratory disease. I further urge epa to
> find out if our readings our accurate. As you know I claim I can tell
> pollution numbers by just being in the room or outside of an area and I am
> urging federal and health inspectors to look at particulate pollution and
> its affects on people especially as we get fewer and fewer days of clean
> air
> . I am not sure if a moderate particulate rating in my area affects people
> the same way as moderate in another area does as the exact chemicals are
> different. What I do know is my body shuts down on so called moderate
> readings. Our area has more cancers and heart disease and especially
> asthma
> and respiratory disease. I want to know why more isn't being done to show
> effects of worse and worse air on cities like mine who get fewer and fewer
> good air days yet everyone is slient about it and no policy makers are
> doing
> anything about what I call a urgent and emergency situation that affects
> every baby and adult who lives here. The longer the more effects. . I
> would
> like for researchers to show exact correlations between peoples health
> correlated to how close they are to areas like mine compared to people who
> get clean air. and ate the same relatively healthy things and didn't smoke
> or take drugs. I would like to see mortality rates too, although mortality
> is not as important as lost health and lost productivity . I would like to
> see the average persons productivity and age they retire here compared to
> people who get good air.
> My assertion is big oil and news consolidation has allowed millions of
> people to live in areas where they are being harmed greatly without a gov
> or
> leaders doing anything about it. In another aspect I think some people
> actually might know of the damages as we are targeted constantly with more
> health care commercials then I have ever seen and here again I would bet
> my
> life its because the health care providers and drug companies know whats
> happening here and rather sell meds to people who are poisoned then tell
> people why they need them.... The comparisons in health care commercials
> might not be able to be done, but if they could my assertions who get more
> and why might also show the same correlations of people at risk unfairly
> without anyone protecting them... and still not doing enough in most
> affected areas to curb it.*pollution
> Please realize I think total amount of pollution is not necessarily the
> only
> way to compare rates of pollution. One has to compare the total length of
> time people are exposed to moderate or worse particulate pollution like we
> get compared to people who get clean air also. My assertion is total
> amount
> can be limited to a few days and may not show cause and affect as much as
> people who keep getting less and less of just good quality air.
> If anyone wants to contact me and comment please email me at
> mcsantpollution@
> I am warning people before many people of the dangers going on and I want
> to know why more isn't done to protect people. All things are connected
> and
> we don't need to harm ourselves in order to protect old energy policies
> but
> that is what happening . I would compare in addition to our area all
> cities
> with moderate or worse particulate pollution a good majority of the time
> immediataly to show possible cause for unusual amounts of harm that it
> might and quite possibilty its doing and the only way to do that is
> compare
> health of organs and do stress tests to eveyone living in two different
> environments. I think without any doubt in my mine the damages are
> disturbing and has caused millions of peoples lost of life and health
> before
> their time. Maybe God forbid this is leaders way to kill off dysfunctional
> areas of people in the country. God only knows I only ask for researchers
> to
> study this pollution, health risk based on objective standards and not
> just
> on total amounts of pollution.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>